I’m here in Warsaw at the annual UN climate talks – part of what are, perhaps, the most crucial negotiations for the future of our planet. However, to my surprise, New Zealand are not covering the talks at all.
Saskia McCulloch: Straight to the point - One
So in the outrageously busy schedules that a delegate of COP19 has the days turn into a blur. However, a short and snappy quote, tends to jog the memory and get straight to the point. Each day (hopefully) i'll gather the best of them. Contextualize them the best I can. =)
Natalie Jones: COP19 in 5 photos: first impressions
Welcome to the weird and wonderful world of the UN: loosely-structured chaos which often borders on the bizarre. COP is a mixture of the deadly serious and the straight-out hilarious - here are a few key picks from the first two days.
Natalie Jones: Warsaw: The nature of the problem
I’ve just survived my first day at COP 19! To avoid total confusion, I thought I’d ask the simple question: what are negotiators hoping to achieve in Warsaw? Unsurprisingly, it turns out that this is actually not such a simple question. To get to the answer, we need to go a short way back into the history of the UNFCCC (don’t worry though, I won’t subject you to too many acronyms), and also to look at what science tells us.
Climate change is with us - here and now
Just days ago, a typhoon described by CNN as 'worse than hell' hit the Philippines. So far, it is expected that over 10,000 people in just one area may be dead as a result, with a more thorough count yet to be made.
Mere hours ago, the same typhoon made landfall in Vietnam. Over 600,000 people were evacuated from key areas.
In a world committed to a minimum of 2 degrees warming, this is the new reality. It is no longer a case of speculation - as New Zealand's negotiators said to stakeholders today, "the effects of climate change are with us, here and now".
The Warsaw United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP 19) began this morning, keenly aware of this fact. Developing nations are insistent that developed states take action, and recognise the principle of common but differentiated responsibility agreed upon in Rio in 1992. The principle seems simple; those nations that have most influenced our climate's changing - in most cases, those same ones with more resources, both financial and technological, to help address the problem - carry the same responsibility as others, but must do more in accordance with their greater capacity. In reality, though, this principle isn't as easy to enforce as it would seem on paper, and it would seem that economic interests are destined to always take precedence. In reality, no nation will make the sacrifice of taking drastic action until it is clear they won't be alone. It's a glorious, tragic stalemate.
It comes as no surprise, then, that the COP opened this morning with an impassioned address from the Philippines' negotiator, Yeb Sano. His urgency was clear; he's even announced he will be undertaking a hunger strike until a climate deal is in sight. It's too late to expect a world where Typhoon Haiyans aren't the new normal - as our negotiators said in Auckland last week, we've "missed the boat" as far as that's concerned.
We can, however, take mitigating action to make sure that 'normal' isn't any worse than that. We can take action to soften the blow, helping nations adapt to this reality.
But that action has to be now.
Natalie Jones: Youth Conference: A Wrap Up
Wow! The Conference of Youth/Powershift has been amazing!
I’ve attended workshops on social media, communications, intergenerational equity (a big lobbying point for YOUNGO at COP19), climate related disaster relief, corporate sponsorship of COP19, and the connections between COP and national campaigns. I’ve been lucky enough to meet people from all around the world, all focused on one goal: climate justice.
Climate change engagement for non environmental NGOs
I attended a workshop this morning about trying to get climate change issues into NGOs who don't purely focus on environmental issues. The workshop was targeted more for those working within the NGOs and focused on both what problems they have faced, and also ways around those problems. I have compiled a list of their suggestions below:
Problems:
-People didn't respond to direct messaging, they don't change lifestyle or acknowledge how they are influencing the environment.
-Some organisations that are apolitical and find events or causes that have a political stance scary. Specifically for COP, some organisations are not even sure if they should be at COP as observers
-Getting environmental issues into already existing strategies and programmes is hard.
-Hard showing link to other issues
-There are challenges with capacity to integrate the ideas. With everyone focused on what they are doing within the organization, trying to find ways of integrating it into what they are already doing can be challenging eg time, capacity, money, interest.
-Hard to phrase Global responsibility in a way that the organization wants to include it in its mandate.
-Excuse of not being an nature or environmental organization.
-The organisation doesn't feel like they have the expertise to talk about the issue or get involved in it.
-The people involved, or the people the organisation targets, does not care about the environment or it is not a major issue in their mind.
Solutions:
-Meeting people, making connections.
-Making links between organization culture and how that is tied to climate change issues
-If they don't feel like they have the needed expertise then they can team up with an organisation that does eg Scouts and Greenpeace.
-Find groups in your region that you can team up with to do joint programmes with.
-Rather than preaching, create the space for conversations.
-A good example is carbon conversations. This gets groups of people together to discuss challenges involves with reducing their carbon impact.
-Practice what we teach and think strategically. We have to watch what our carbon footprint looks like and those of our family and community.
All posts by Institute delegates reflect their own thoughts, opinions and experiences, and do not reflect those of the Institute.
For official Institute updates, take a look here.
Language barrier
I would just like to reiterate how lucky we are that COY9/CEE Power Shift/COP19 all use English as the main language, even though we are in Poland. I wonder if there would be more Polish youth engagement if CEE Power Shift was separate and they were able to discuss all this amazing information we are learning in Polish? I also wonder how would that change the outcomes and direction of the workshops and other discussions at the conference? Interesting to consider. I will be closely examining language barriers at the COP19 conference!
All posts by Institute delegates reflect their own thoughts, opinions and experiences, and do not reflect those of the Institute.
For official Institute updates, take a look here.